Victoria V. Tsylina, Shareholder at Lurie-Zepeda

Victoria V. Tsylina

Shareholder
Phone:310.274.8700 ext. 109
Fax:310.294.8844
Email:vtsylina@lurie-zepeda.com

Education and Affiliations

Education:

  • Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, California
    • Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, May 2013
    • Dean’s Honor List
    • Sayre Macneil Scholar
    • Mabel Wilson Richards Scholarship; J. Rex Dibble Scholarship; Jesuit Community Scholarship
  • Stavropol State University, Stavropol, Russia
    • Bachelor of Arts, Law, October 2009
    • Dean’s List
    • First Honors Award for graduate thesis The Killing by a Mother of the Newborn Child

Professional Associations/Memberships:

  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • Santa Monica Bar Association
  • American Bar Association
  • Claims Litigation Management Alliance
  • Professional Liability Underwriters Society

Awards:

  • Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, 2021
  • Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, 2022
  • Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, 2023

Super Lawyers Rising Stars Victoria Tsylina

Victoria V. Tsylina: Professional Profile

Victoria Tsylina focuses her practice on litigation in business, real estate, trust and probate matters.  Her main objective is to promote clients’ interests, aggressively working up their cases and developing thorough legal strategies on their behalf.  Ms. Tsylina has extensive experience in all phases of litigation, including taking and defending depositions, law and motion practice, alternative dispute resolution procedures, and trial.  She has attained favorable results for her clients in early stages of litigation, by obtaining summary judgments and dismissals via demurrers.  Ms. Tsylina’s other representative achievements involve the following:

  • Together with Steve Hogan, Ms. Tsylina represented the trustee of a high net worth trust with a diverse array of assets, including numerous brokerage accounts and complex real estate holdings, in a case involving allegations of trustee’s breach of fiduciary duty by the trust’s beneficiaries. While the beneficiaries claimed substantial damages, through thorough defense, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan resolved the case for only 2% of the claimed damages amount. Among other things, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan’s discovery strategy proved that the trustee was wholly transparent with the beneficiaries and that the beneficiaries’ complaints were prompted by their own personal issues they had with trustee, as opposed to trustee’s alleged improper actions. Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan successfully argued that the trustee could not be held responsible for the actions of the prior trustee under the facts of the case. Additionally, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan aggressive defense included an award of over $60,000 in discovery sanctions for discovery abuse by the beneficiaries.
  • Represented co-trustee wife against her co-trustee husband who attempted to revoke their trust while their divorce proceedings were already pending in the family law court. The trust agreement provided for revocation only by the agreement of both co-trustees, and the wife refused to revoke the trust. The revocation during their divorce would have resulted in the devastating circumstances of the husband’s ability to dispose of some of the trust’s assets while their character (community vs. separate property) was being determined by the family court.  The probate court stayed revocation proceedings in response to Ms. Tsylina’s demurrer and directed all proceedings to be had in the famiy law court.  This stay played a very significant role in obtaining a favorable settlement for the co-trustee wife in the family court.
  • Represented a consumer client in a loan assumption transaction involving real estate, where a financial institution delayed closing the transaction for months. Ms. Tsylina’s knowledge of the applicable regulations, which were signified in a pre-litigation demand letter to the financial institution, prompted closing of the loan assumption transaction within just a few days after the demand was sent.

Ms. Tsylina graduated magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, from Loyola Law School.  During law school, she served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Arthur Alarcon in the United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) and the California Superior Court Judge Rex Heeseman.

Prior to becoming a litigator in the United States, Ms. Tsylina earned her law degree and practiced privately in Russia.  Because the Russian legal system (civil law) shares many features with the common law system, Ms. Tsylina developed superior negotiation skills that have proven helpful to her as an attorney in the United States.

Ms. Tsylina is fluent in both English and Russian, and also speaks conversational Spanish.

Ms. Tsylina is a member of Los Angeles County Bar Association and Santa Monica Bar Association. She provides continuing legal education and enjoys preparing presentations on topics involving cutting-edge legal issues. Her recent presentations include “Managing Probate Estate,” “Attorney-Client Privilege in Trust & Estates Matters” and “Habitability Issues from Landlord’s Prospective.”

Victoria V. Tsylina's Results by Practice Area


Employment Litigation

Successfully prosecuted a class action lawsuit against a national retail chain.  Ms. Tsylina’s clients alleged that they and other employees were misclassified as exempt employees, when they were actually non-exempt and entitled to compensation for overtime and breaks.  After engaging in extensive class action discovery and aggressively pushing the case to trial, defendant agreed to seven-figure settlement and to fairly treat such employees going forward.

Successfully defended wage-and-hour litigation and had Plaintiff-alleged employee agree to a mutual walkaway by filing a cross-complaint against him for breach of contract and disgorgement of profits for performing work without necessary licenses.

Real Estate Litigation

Successfully represented a commercial landlord in a dispute with the former tenant, obtaining compensation for damages caused by the tenant’s improper maintenance of the property during the term of the lease in violation of the lease agreement. Ms. Tsylina’s case strategy involved the selection and engagement of a qualified expert consultant to prepare an opinion on the nature and cause of various items of damages, showing that the damages caused were beyond reasonable wear and tear of commercial property.

Represented a consumer client in a loan assumption transaction for real estate, where a financial institution delayed closing the transaction for months. Ms. Tsylina’s knowledge of the applicable regulations, which were signified in a pre-litigation demand letter to the financial institution, prompted closing the loan assumption transaction within just a few days after the demand was sent.

Negotiated a favorable settlement in a case involving real property disputes related to the partition and ownership of three residential real properties located in Los Angeles, with total value of approximately $6,000,000.

Successfully defended a case for breach of fiduciary duty between tenants-in-common who owned residential property, by filing a cross-complaint for partition of that property and negotiating a favorable settlement solution, where Plaintiff agreed to client’s proposed voluntary sale of the property during one of the best seasons for home sales.

Within a few weeks after Ms. Tsylina filed a motion for summary judgment on behalf of Defendant-Home Owners Association on the issue of CC&Rs’ interpretation, the homeowner agreed to dismiss his suit for a payment of a nominal sum representing less than 5% of his claimed damages.

Trust, Estate & Probate Litigation

Together with Steve Hogan, represented the trustee of a high net worth trust with a diverse array of assets, including numerous brokerage accounts and complex real estate holdings, in a case involving allegations of a breach of fiduciary duty by the trust’s beneficiaries. While the beneficiaries claimed substantial damages, through thorough defense, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan resolved the case for only 2% of the claimed damages amount. Among other things, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan’s discovery strategy proved that the trustee was wholly transparent with the beneficiaries and that the beneficiaries’ complaints were prompted by their own personal issues as opposed to any improper actions of the trustee. Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan successfully argued that the trustee could not be held responsible for the actions of the prior trustee under the facts of the case. Additionally, Ms. Tsylina and Mr. Hogan obtained over $60,000 in discovery sanctions for discovery abuse by beneficiaries.

Prevented a co-trustee husband from revoking a trust he had with his co-trustee wife in probate court while their divorce proceedings were already pending in the family law court. The trust agreement provided for revocation only by the agreement of both co-trustees, and the wife refused to revoke the trust. The revocation during their divorce would have resulted in the devastating circumstances of the husband’s ability to dispose of some of the trust’s assets while their character (community vs. separate property) was being determined by the family court. The probate court stayed revocation proceedings. This stay played a very significant role in obtaining a favorable settlement for the co-trustee wife in the family court.

Successfully defended a spouse in a probate matter involving a motion to reopen her late husband’s estate proceeding. The decedent’s property was already administered pursuant to a court order which left everything to the spouse.  The moving party claimed he had recently found the decedent’s will in which the decedent had left the bulk of the estate to him, and that the spouse therefore was not entitled to the decedent’s property.  Ms. Tsylina was able to prove that the decedent had revoked that will and that the distribution to the spouse was therefore appropriate.  Ms. Tsylina also successfully argued that the moving party significantly delayed bringing the probate proceedings before the Court.  The motion was denied in favor of Ms. Tsylina’s client, with the original court order on spousal property petition left undisturbed.

Premises Liability

Tried a premises liability case where plaintiff was severely injured on-site, requiring extensive orthopedic surgery. Ms. Tsylina was able to prove that plaintiff’s future lost earnings claim of approximately $2,000,000 was actually worth zero.  Although plaintiff’s claimed damages exceeded $3,000,000, the jury awarded her only $180,000, barely more than what Ms. Tsylina’s client offered as settlement before trial. This case and its trial were featured in Daily Journal on April 1, 2017, at https://www.dailyjournal.com/verdicts_and_settlements/103356-daisy-rivera-v-super-center-concepts-inc-dba-superior-grocers-and-does-1-to-50

successfully argued and obtained summary judgment on behalf of her client on the issue of their lack of control over the premises where Plaintiffs were injured.

Malpractice

Won a summary judgment motion for attorney client in a legal malpractice lawsuit in which Plaintiff demanded $5 Million in damages against its former attorney. This case was featured in Daily Journal on February 5, 2021. Read article here.

Negotiated a favorable settlement for a client in accountancy malpractice case involving complex tax issues on innocent spouse relief, equitable relief and separate liability election.

Second-chaired the trial of a medical malpractice action involving complex cosmetic surgery procedures. Due to Ms. Tsylina’s strong defense of the action, during the middle of trial, plaintiff agreed to settle for less than 10% of her claimed damages.